Add The 12 Week Year reading workspace

2日前 · 81f251991c
--- a/AGENTS.MD
+++ b/AGENTS.MD
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
 Here's your file with the folder/file-output rule properly integrated into the structure (added a Folder Structure section, updated Intake Protocol step 2, updated Step 4/5 to reference output files, and added output paths in MEMORY.md):

 # Agent Directives: Active Reading & Book Synthesis Partner

 ## System Identity & Objectives
@@ -14,94 +12,154 @@ You are an expert knowledge retrieval partner, cognitive scaffolding assistant,

 ---

 ## Rules
 - Every book gets its own folder.
 - All output (previews, reviews, summaries) gets saved as `.md` files inside that book's folder so the user can go back and review them.
 ## Rules & Architecture
 - **Book Folders**: Every book gets its own dedicated folder under `/library/[Book Title]/`.
 - **Chapter Folders**: Every chapter gets its own subfolder: `/library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/`.
 - **Single-File Chapter Lifecycle**: All preview briefings, review discussions (questions, user answers, and feedback), and final synthesis for a single chapter live in one living file:
  `/library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md`
 - **Living File Updates**: When moving across steps (Preview -> Review -> Summary), append or update sections within the same `chapter-notes.md` rather than generating separate files.

 ## Folder Structure

 ```text
 /library/
 ├── [Book Title]/
 │   ├── source-file.pdf (or .epub/.txt)
 │   ├── Chapter-01/
 │   │   └── chapter-notes.md
 │   ├── Chapter-02/
 │   │   └── chapter-notes.md
 │   └── ...
 └── MEMORY.md  <-- Master reading log at root

 /library/[Book Title]/source-file.pdf /library/[Book Title]/chapter-01-summary.md /library/[Book Title]/chapter-02-summary.md ... MEMORY.md <- master progress log, root level
 Intake Protocol (Triggered manually when the user mentions/uploads a new file)

 Since file-system watching isn't available in chat, the user will flag new files by saying something like "new file in intake" or by uploading/pasting the file. When that happens:

 ---
 Identify the file: Title, author (if available), format (PDF/EPUB/TXT).
 Create the book directory structure: Initialize /library/[Book Title]/ and place the source file inside it. Check MEMORY.md — if this book has no entry, initialize one.
 Scan structure: Extract the table of contents / chapter list if possible.
 Confirm starting point with the user: "Start from Chapter 1, or resume from your last logged position?"
 Initialize Chapter 1: Create /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-01/ and prepare for the Pre-Reading Briefing.
 Core Workflow (Repeats per chapter)
 Step 1 — Pre-Reading Briefing (/preview [Book] | [Chapter])

 ## Intake Protocol (Triggered manually when the user mentions/uploads a new file)
 Before the user reads, give them a short primer so they know what to watch for.

 Since file-system watching isn't available in chat, the user will flag new files by saying something like "new file in intake" or by uploading/pasting the file. When that happens:
 Create /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md (or initialize if not present).
 Output in chat and write under ## 1. Pre-Reading Briefing:
 Core Question: What problem/idea is this chapter trying to resolve?
 3–5 Things to Look For: Key terms, arguments, or shifts in the author's logic.
 Connection to Prior Chapters: Linking context from MEMORY.md.
 Do NOT reveal conclusions yet — just orient attention.
 Step 2 — User Reads

 1. **Identify the file**: title, author (if available), format (PDF/EPUB/TXT).
 2. **Create the book's folder**: `/library/[Book Title]/` and place the source file inside it. Check `MEMORY.md` — if this book has no entry, create one.
 3. **Scan structure**: Extract the table of contents / chapter list if possible.
 4. **Confirm starting point** with the user: "Start from Chapter 1, or resume from your last logged position?"
 5. **Proceed to the Pre-Reading Briefing** for the relevant chapter.
 No action needed. Wait for the user to return and say "done" or /review.

 ---
 Step 3 — Post-Reading Review (/review [Book] | [Chapter])

 Once the user confirms they have finished reading:

 Provide 2–3 open-ended questions testing their grasp of what was flagged in Step 1.
 Wait for the user to answer in their own words.
 Provide targeted feedback: affirm correct insights, clarify misconceptions, and fill blind spots.
 Append this Q&A dialogue into /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md under ## 2. Reading Review & Reflections.
 Step 4 — Chapter Summary (/summarize [Book] | [Chapter])

 After the review discussion, produce the final structured summary and append it to /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md under ## 3. Chapter Synthesis:

 ## Core Workflow (Repeats per chapter)
 Core Thesis: One definitive sentence.
 Key Concepts / Mental Models: Bolded terms with definitions + practical application.
 Notable Arguments & Evidence: Studies, examples, or logic used.
 How This Updates Prior Understanding: Does it confirm, extend, or contradict earlier chapters?
 Action Item: One way to apply this chapter's idea this week.
 Step 5 — Update Memory

 ### Step 1 — Pre-Reading Briefing (`/preview [Book] | [Chapter]`)
 Before the user reads, give them a short primer so they know what to watch for:
 - **Chapter's Core Question**: What problem/idea is this chapter trying to resolve?
 - **3–5 Things to Look For**: Key terms, arguments, or shifts in the author's logic.
 - **Connection to Prior Chapters**: One line linking this chapter to what's already logged in `MEMORY.md`.
 - Do NOT reveal conclusions yet — just orient attention.
 Append the finalized summary to MEMORY.md under the book's entry, advance the "Current Position" marker, and log the path to the consolidated chapter-notes.md file.

 ### Step 2 — User Reads
 No action needed. Wait for the user to return and say "done" or `/review`.
 Prompt the user with what to do next (e.g., "Ready for Chapter X preview?").

 ### Step 3 — Post-Reading Review (`/review [Book] | [Chapter]`)
 Once the user confirms they've finished reading:
 - Ask 2–3 open-ended questions testing their grasp of what you flagged in Step 1.
 - Let the user answer in their own words FIRST.
 - Then give feedback: confirm what they got right, correct misconceptions, and fill gaps.
 Maintenance, Migration & Cleanup Protocols
 Migration Protocol (/migrate [Book])

 ### Step 4 — Chapter Summary (`/summarize [Book] | [Chapter]`)
 After the review discussion, produce the final structured summary and save it as `/library/[Book Title]/chapter-XX-summary.md`:
 - **Core Thesis**: One sentence.
 - **Key Concepts / Mental Models**: Bolded terms with definitions + practical application.
 - **Notable Arguments & Evidence**: Studies, examples, or logic used.
 - **How This Updates Prior Understanding**: Does it confirm, extend, or contradict earlier chapters?
 - **Action Item**: One way to apply this chapter's idea this week.
 Use this command to convert legacy flat files (e.g., chapter-01-summary.md, chapter-01-preview.md) into the new chapter folder structure:

 ### Step 5 — Update Memory
 Append the finalized summary to `MEMORY.md` under the book's entry, advance the "Current Position" marker, and note the path to the saved `.md` file.
 Scan /library/[Book Title]/ for legacy standalone chapter files.
 For each detected chapter:
 Create /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/.
 Merge previews, notes, reviews, and summaries into /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md following the standard template.
 Remove or archive the legacy loose markdown files once verified.
 Update all file references in MEMORY.md to point to the new /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-XX/chapter-notes.md paths.
 Report a summary of migrated chapters and consolidated files to the user.
 Cleanup Protocol (/cleanup [Book])

 It is okay to prompt me what I want you to do next.
 Use this command to audit and tidy up a book's workspace:

 Identify any orphaned .md files outside standard Chapter-XX/ folders.
 Check MEMORY.md against the file system:
 Verify every logged chapter has a valid chapter-notes.md.
 Flag any missing notes or unindexed chapter directories.
 Prune empty folders or temp files after getting user confirmation.
 Regenerate or clean up any stale paths in MEMORY.md.
 Self-Improvement

 You can update this directive file if you identify patterns or techniques that measurably improve comprehension, retention, or structural clarity for the user.

 Templates
 Consolidated Chapter File Template (chapter-notes.md)
 # [Book Title] — Chapter [XX]: [Chapter Title]
 - **Date Created**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
 - **Status**: Complete / In Progress

 ---

 ## Self-Improvement
 You can update this file if you learn a way to do something that helps me learn or retain information better.
 ## 1. Pre-Reading Briefing
 - **Core Question**:
 - **Key Points to Watch For**:
  - Point 1
  - Point 2
  - Point 3
 - **Context & Thread from Prior Chapters**:

 ---

 ## Memory File: `MEMORY.md`
 ## 2. Reading Review & Reflections
 - **Prompt Questions**:
  1. ...
  2. ...
 - **User Key Takeaways**:
 - **Scaffolding & Feedback**:

 ---

 This file is the single source of truth for reading progress. Maintain one entry per book using this exact template. Always re-read the relevant entry before starting any command for that book.
 ## 3. Chapter Synthesis
 - **Core Thesis**:
 - **Key Concepts / Mental Models**:
  - **[Concept 1]**: Definition and practical implication.
  - **[Concept 2]**: Definition and practical implication.
 - **Notable Arguments & Evidence**:
 - **Updates to Prior Understanding**:
 - **Weekly Action Item**:

 ```markdown
 Memory File Template (MEMORY.md)
 # Reading Memory Log

 ## [Book Title] — [Author]
 - **Status**: In Progress / Completed / Paused
 - **Current Position**: Chapter X of Y
 - **Folder**: /library/[Book Title]/
 - **Last Updated**: [date]
 - **Last Updated**: [YYYY-MM-DD]

 ### Chapter Summaries
 ### Chapter Index
 #### Chapter 1 — [Title]
 - File: /library/[Book Title]/chapter-01-summary.md
 - Notes File: /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis:
 - Key Concepts:
 - Notable Arguments:
 - Action Item:

 #### Chapter 2 — [Title]
 - Notes File: /library/[Book Title]/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
 ...

 ### Running Threads
 (Recurring themes, contradictions, or questions spanning multiple chapters — update as they emerge)



 (Recurring themes, contradictions, cross-chapter patterns, or open questions)
--- a/MEMORY.md
+++ b/MEMORY.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Reading Memory Log

 ## Your Best Year Ever - Michael Hyatt
 ## Your Best Year Ever — Michael Hyatt
 - **Status**: In Progress
 - **Current Position**: Chapter 2 of 15 read; active-recall review awaiting reader responses
 - **Folder**: /library/Your Best Year Ever/
@@ -9,21 +9,21 @@

 ### Chapter Index

 #### Chapter 00 - Your Best Is Yet to Come (Opening)
 #### Chapter 00 — Your Best Is Yet to Come (Opening)
 - Notes File: /library/Your Best Year Ever/Chapter-00/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis: Hyatt argues that meaningful progress begins with assessing the present and addressing beliefs, past experiences, goal design, motivation, and action.
 - Key Concepts: Interconnected life domains; starting-point assessment; growth assumptions distinct from the five action steps.
 - Notable Arguments: The race story illustrates persistence rather than proving the system; the reader's emotional-marital example illustrates connections between domains; body and money assessment results were lower than expected.
 - Action Item: Revisit assessment answers for body and money and record one specific observation in each that helps explain the unexpected result.

 #### Chapter 1 - Your Beliefs Shape Your Reality
 #### Chapter 1 — Your Beliefs Shape Your Reality
 - Notes File: /library/Your Best Year Ever/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis: Beliefs about what is possible influence perception, strategy, effort, and persistence, so untested assumptions can become practical barriers.
 - Key Concepts: Beliefs as filters; self-fulfilling prophecy; limiting beliefs and liberating truths; reframing circumstances; doubt as self-protection.
 - Notable Arguments: The Invisible Fence illustrates an internalized barrier; Steve Mura's changed frame enabled a new strategy; historical achievement examples illustrate how demonstrated possibility can expand expectations without proving that belief alone guarantees success.
 - Action Item: At a suitable future time, complete three short watercolor sessions using the same subject and assess enjoyment, improvement, and pride after each; no deadline has been set.

 #### Chapter 2 - Some Beliefs Hold You Back
 #### Chapter 2 — Some Beliefs Hold You Back
 - Notes File: /library/Your Best Year Ever/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis: Pending completion of the active-recall review.
 - Key Concepts: Scarcity and abundance; beliefs about the world, other people, and oneself; thinking-pattern warning signs; sources of limiting beliefs.
@@ -43,3 +43,38 @@
 - Chapter 2 preview prepared without conclusions. Reading focus: scarcity versus abundance, beliefs about the world/others/self, warning signs of limiting beliefs, their possible sources, and the difference between illustrations and evidence.
 - Reader finished Chapter 2. Three active-recall questions are saved in /library/Your Best Year Ever/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md; responses are pending.
 - Chapter 2 preview and pending review were consolidated into /library/Your Best Year Ever/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md under the new single-file chapter structure. The reader repeated "done," but has not yet answered the active-recall questions.

 ## The 12 Week Year — Brian P. Moran and Michael Lennington
 - **Status**: In Progress
 - **Current Position**: Chapter 2 read; active-recall review awaiting reader responses
 - **Folder**: /library/The 12 Week Year/
 - **Source File**: /library/The 12 Week Year/source-file.pdf
 - **Structure**: 21 chapters; contents indexed in /library/The 12 Week Year/book-structure.md
 - **Current Notes**: /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
 - **Last Updated**: 2026-10-01

 ### Chapter Index

 #### Chapter 1 — The Challenge
 - Notes File: /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis: Results depend less on acquiring more knowledge than on consistently executing the few high-value actions that convert existing knowledge and goals into outcomes.
 - Key Concepts: The execution gap; knowledge–action distinction; the critical few; consistency over novelty.
 - Notable Arguments: The top-producer, diet-and-fitness, and Ann Laufman examples illustrate the authors’ execution thesis, but the chapter relies on anecdotes and broad comparisons rather than controlled evidence.
 - Action Item: Practice guitar for at least 30 minutes every day, selecting a specific skill, exercise, or passage before each session; unstructured noodling does not count.

 #### Chapter 2 — Redefining the Year
 - Notes File: /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
 - Core Thesis: Pending post-reading review.
 - Key Concepts: Annualized thinking; deadline effects; periodization; the twelve-week planning horizon.
 - Action Item: Pending post-reading review.

 ### Running Threads
 - Chapter 1 preview prepared without conclusions. Reading focus: knowledge versus execution, the claimed barrier between potential and results, the quality of support for the authors’ claims, the “critical few,” and the book’s promised structure.
 - Cross-book question: Does this book’s emphasis on execution complement or challenge *Your Best Year Ever*’s framework of beliefs, goal design, motivation, and action?
 - Reader finished Chapter 1. Three active-recall questions and the reader’s initial responses are saved in /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md.
 - Chapter 1 review responses: reader identified execution as the key gap, consistency as the lesson from Ann Laufman’s example, and Bible study, guitar practice, and work as areas of inconsistent action. Feedback clarified knowledge-versus-implementation, the “critical few,” and the limits of a single client example.
 - Reader selected guitar for application: at least 30 minutes every day of focused, intentional practice rather than noodling. A focused session begins with a predetermined skill, exercise, or passage to improve; this became the finalized weekly action item.
 - Chapter 1 finalized in /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md. The chapter frames inconsistent execution—not lack of information—as the central barrier between potential and results, with emphasis on the critical few and consistency over novelty.
 - Cross-book connection resolved: Chapter 1 complements *Your Best Year Ever* by treating consistent behavior as the mechanism that turns beliefs, goals, and motivation into results.
 - Chapter 2 preview prepared without conclusions. Reading focus: annualized thinking, the proposed deadline–urgency relationship, periodization as an analogy, daily and weekly execution under a twelve-week horizon, evidence quality, and possible trade-offs from sustained urgency.
 - Reader finished Chapter 2. Three active-recall questions are saved in /library/The 12 Week Year/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md; responses are pending.
--- a/Year/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md
+++ b/Year/Chapter-01/chapter-notes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
 # The 12 Week Year — Chapter 01: The Challenge
 - **Date Created**: 2026-10-01
 - **Status**: Complete

 ---

 ## 1. Pre-Reading Briefing
 - **Core Question**: Why do people and organizations so often fall short of what they appear capable of achieving, even when they already possess useful knowledge, ideas, and resources?
 - **Key Points to Watch For**:
  - How the authors distinguish knowing what to do from consistently doing it.
  - What the authors identify as the primary barrier between potential and results.
  - The kinds of support they use for their claims—especially where they rely on client examples, broad observations, or measurable evidence.
  - What they mean by focusing on the “critical few,” and how this differs from simply working longer or harder.
  - What the chapter promises the rest of the book will provide, including the different roles of Parts I and II.
 - **Context & Thread from Prior Chapters**: This is the opening chapter, so there is no earlier argument within the book to connect. As a cross-book thread, notice whether its emphasis on execution complements or challenges *Your Best Year Ever*’s emphasis on beliefs, goal design, motivation, and action.

 ---

 ## 2. Reading Review & Reflections
 - **Prompt Questions**:
  1. In your own words, what do the authors identify as the main gap between a person’s potential and their actual results? Why do they argue that acquiring more knowledge is often not the solution?
  2. What does Ann Laufman’s example suggest about the “critical few” activities and consistent execution? What does her story illustrate—and what, by itself, does it not prove?
  3. Identify one area of your own life where you probably already know enough to improve but do not act consistently. What specific behavior is missing or irregular?
 - **User Key Takeaways**:
  1. “Execution is the key.”
  2. Ann Laufman’s example emphasizes consistency.
  3. Areas of inconsistent action include Bible study, guitar practice, and work.
  4. Selected application: practice guitar for at least 30 minutes each day using focused, intentional practice rather than unstructured noodling.
 - **Scaffolding & Feedback**:
  - The first response correctly identifies the chapter’s central claim. The fuller distinction is that knowledge, ideas, talent, and effort can matter, but they create results only when translated into repeated action; acquiring more information does not repair a failure to follow through.
  - The second response correctly notices consistency. Ann’s story specifically illustrates the authors’ idea that steady execution of a few high-value activities can outperform searching for a new strategy or merely adding work hours.
  - Ann’s story is an illustrative client case, not proof by itself that the method caused her reported 400 percent production increase or that others will obtain comparable results. The chapter does not provide a comparison group or enough detail to rule out other causes.
  - The personal examples identify three promising application areas, but they remain broad domains. The next step in the review is to choose one and define the exact missing behavior and a realistic frequency.
  - The guitar commitment supplies both a minimum duration and a daily cadence. To keep “focused practice” observable, begin each session with a predetermined skill, exercise, or passage to improve; playing without a chosen target does not count toward the 30 minutes.

 ---

 ## 3. Chapter Synthesis
 - **Core Thesis**: Results depend less on acquiring more knowledge than on consistently executing the few high-value actions that convert existing knowledge and goals into outcomes.
 - **Key Concepts / Mental Models**:
  - **The Execution Gap**: The distance between what a person knows or is capable of doing and what that person repeatedly does. Practical application: before seeking another strategy, identify whether the current strategy is actually being followed.
  - **Knowledge–Action Distinction**: Knowledge has potential value, but it produces results only through implementation. Practical application: translate an insight into an observable behavior rather than treating learning itself as progress.
  - **The Critical Few**: A small set of activities contributes disproportionately to meaningful results. Practical application: identify and protect these activities before spending time on lower-value work.
  - **Consistency over Novelty**: Repeated execution of a sound approach may matter more than continually searching for new ideas. Practical application: evaluate adherence before replacing a plan.
 - **Notable Arguments & Evidence**:
  - A top insurance producer reportedly shared his successful approach, yet none of the other agents reproduced his results because they did not follow through. This illustrates an implementation problem but does not isolate why the other agents failed.
  - The authors contrast the abundance of diet and fitness information with widespread weight problems to argue that information alone is insufficient. This is an illustrative comparison, not a controlled test of their explanation.
  - Financial adviser Ann Laufman reportedly increased production by 400 percent while emphasizing consistent performance of existing high-value activities rather than longer hours or a new market strategy. Her case supports the plausibility of the authors’ framework, but one client story cannot establish causation or generalizability.
  - The chapter says the system has been developed through extensive client work, but it does not yet present systematic outcome data or a method for separating the system’s effects from other influences.
 - **Updates to Prior Understanding**: As the opening chapter, it establishes the book’s central problem rather than revising an earlier chapter. It complements *Your Best Year Ever*: beliefs, goal design, and motivation can shape direction, while consistent execution determines whether those ideas become observable behavior and results.
 - **Weekly Action Item**: Practice guitar for at least 30 minutes every day. Before each session, choose a specific skill, exercise, or passage to improve; unstructured noodling does not count toward the 30 minutes.
--- a/Year/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
+++ b/Year/Chapter-02/chapter-notes.md
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
 # The 12 Week Year — Chapter 02: Redefining the Year
 - **Date Created**: 2026-10-01
 - **Status**: In Progress

 ---

 ## 1. Pre-Reading Briefing
 - **Core Question**: How might the time horizon used to define a “year” affect urgency, focus, and day-to-day execution?
 - **Key Points to Watch For**:
  - How the authors define **annualized thinking**, including the assumptions about time and future performance that they believe it encourages.
  - The proposed link between distant deadlines, procrastination, and the surge of activity often seen near year-end. Notice which parts are supported by evidence and which are observations or assertions.
  - How **periodization** is transferred from athletic training into business and personal planning, and where that analogy seems strong or limited.
  - What changes when twelve weeks becomes the primary planning and measurement horizon—especially at the weekly and daily levels.
  - Potential trade-offs: whether repeated urgency supports sustained focus or risks creating pressure, short-termism, or fatigue, and how the chapter addresses renewal between cycles.
 - **Context & Thread from Prior Chapters**: Chapter 1 identified inconsistent execution—not lack of knowledge—as the central gap between potential and results, and emphasized consistently performing the “critical few.” Chapter 2 now examines whether the conventional annual time horizon contributes to that execution gap. Test whether a compressed horizon genuinely improves behavior or merely changes the feeling of pressure.

 ---

 ## 2. Reading Review & Reflections
 - **Prompt Questions**:
  1. In your own words, what is **annualized thinking**, and through what behavior pattern do the authors believe it weakens execution?
  2. How do the authors adapt athletic **periodization** into the twelve-week model? Why might twelve weeks improve focus, and what potential drawback can you see in maintaining repeated urgency?
  3. What examples or observations does the chapter use to connect deadlines with stronger performance? What do those examples illustrate, and what important claim do they not prove by themselves?
 - **User Key Takeaways**: Pending.
 - **Scaffolding & Feedback**: Pending.

 ---

 ## 3. Chapter Synthesis
 - **Core Thesis**: Pending post-reading review.
 - **Key Concepts / Mental Models**: Pending post-reading review.
 - **Notable Arguments & Evidence**: Pending post-reading review.
 - **Updates to Prior Understanding**: Pending post-reading review.
 - **Weekly Action Item**: Pending post-reading review.
--- a/Year/book-structure.md
+++ b/Year/book-structure.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
 # The 12 Week Year — Book Structure

 - **Authors**: Brian P. Moran and Michael Lennington
 - **Full Title**: *The 12 Week Year: Get More Done in 12 Weeks than Others Do in 12 Months*
 - **Format**: PDF
 - **PDF Length**: 173 pages
 - **Source File**: `/library/The 12 Week Year/source-file.pdf`

 ## Contents

 1. The Challenge — PDF page 12

 ### Part I — Things You Think You Know

 2. Redefining the Year — PDF page 18
 3. The Emotional Connection — PDF page 26
 4. Throw Out the Annual Plan — PDF page 31
 5. One Week at a Time — PDF page 35
 6. Confronting the Truth — PDF page 38
 7. Intentionality — PDF page 43
 8. Accountability as Ownership — PDF page 47
 9. Interest versus Commitment — PDF page 50
 10. Greatness in the Moment — PDF page 54
 11. Intentional Imbalance — PDF page 58

 ### Part II — Putting It All Together

 12. The Execution System — PDF page 62
 13. Establish Your Vision — PDF page 71
 14. Develop Your 12 Week Plan — PDF page 81
 15. Installing Process Control — PDF page 96
 16. Keeping Score — PDF page 106
 17. Take Back Control of Your Day — PDF page 115
 18. Taking Ownership — PDF page 129
 19. 12 Week Commitments — PDF page 137
 20. Your First 12 Weeks — PDF page 151
 21. Final Thoughts and the 13th Week — PDF page 167

 ## Back Matter

 - References
--- a/Year/source-file.pdf
+++ b/Year/source-file.pdf