Você não pode selecionar mais de 25 tópicos
Os tópicos devem começar com uma letra ou um número, podem incluir traços ('-') e podem ter até 35 caracteres.
Spec Driven Development — Chapter 01 Memory: About the author
- Stage: Complete
- Next Step: None (frozen). Next chapter is Chapter 02 (book's section 0).
- Reading Span: PDF pages 11–12
- Source Text: /library/Spec Driven Development/Chapter-01-About-the-author/Chapter-01-source-text.md (the chapter's own words; read instead of the PDF)
- Full Record: /library/Spec Driven Development/Chapter-01-About-the-author/Chapter-01-chapter-notes.md (read only if needed)
- Last Updated: 2026-10-01
Carried-in Context (from earlier chapters)
- First chapter — nothing carried in. (Numbering note: the unnumbered author introduction is Chapter 1 in this log; the book's section 0 is Chapter 2.)
This Chapter
- Core Question: How does the author use his professional history to frame the book?
- Core Thesis: Ködel presents his experience across software delivery methods and long-term product ownership as the reason to examine his proposed development approach.
- Key Concepts: Lifecycle ownership; methodology experience; credibility versus proof.
- Notable Arguments / Evidence Limits: Self-reported experience with a VB6 ERP, high-stakes systems (Basel II), mobile apps, and long-term operation of Meu Cronograma Capilar. These establish perspective but do not compare methods independently.
- Action Item: For one software-method claim this week, distinguish the speaker's experience from evidence the method works in your situation.
Reader State
- Pending Questions: None
- Reader's Answers (paraphrase): Recalled the ERP, Basel II, mobile apps, and personal app; recognized his exposure to heavyweight and agile methods informs his perspective.
- Misconceptions / Feedback Given: Reader trusts the author and wants to see the method; feedback distinguished credibility from evidence of broad effectiveness.
- Personal Threads: None
Open Threads
- Keep testing experience-as-credibility against actual evidence as the method is presented.