#7 Story 1.7: Legacy Schema Compatibility Validation Gate

已關閉
nano3 天之前建立 · 0 條評論

Imported from _bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/1-7-legacy-schema-compatibility-validation-gate.md.

# Story 1.7: Legacy Schema Compatibility Validation Gate

Status: ready-for-dev

Story

As a an administrator, I want to run a compatibility check that confirms legacy table schemas are unchanged against the approved baseline, so that every release can be gated on legacy integrity before deployment.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Given the compatibility check is triggered When it runs against the live database Then it compares all legacy table structures (column names, types, constraints) against the approved schema baseline stored at initialization
  2. Given a structural change is detected on any legacy table When the check completes Then it returns a failure status with a detailed report identifying the affected table, column, and change type (NFR12)
  3. Given no schema drift is detected When the check completes Then it returns a pass confirmation with timestamp, number of tables verified, and zero drift count
  4. Given the check is integrated into the release pipeline When it fails Then the release is blocked automatically and a failure report is surfaced to the administrator
  5. Given an administrator is logged in When they navigate to the compatibility check feature Then they can trigger the check manually and view the most recent check history with timestamps

Tasks / Subtasks

  • Implement story behavior in aligned backend/frontend modules (AC: #1)
    • Add or update API/service/UI components required by the story scope
    • Keep legacy Access entities read-only and route writes to extension-layer structures
  • Cover acceptance criteria #2 in implementation and tests (AC: #2)
    • Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed
  • Cover acceptance criteria #3 in implementation and tests (AC: #3)
    • Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed
  • Cover acceptance criteria #4 in implementation and tests (AC: #4)
    • Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed
  • Validate and document completion evidence
    • Verify build/tests for touched modules
    • Capture changed files and any migration/config implications

Dev Notes

  • Follow Epic 1 architecture constraints: ASP.NET Core + React separation, RBAC-aware patterns, and immutable legacy tables.
  • Reuse shared component and workflow patterns defined in UX and architecture docs; avoid parallel custom implementations.
  • Keep changes scoped to this story; do not pull forward Epic 2+ features.

Project Structure Notes

  • Backend: BriansClientRouteReports.Server/
  • Frontend: brians-client-route-reports-client/
  • Story artifacts: _bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/

References

  • Story source: _bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md (Epic 1 / Story 1.7)
  • Architecture constraints: _bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md
  • UX patterns: _bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md

Dev Agent Record

Agent Model Used

GPT-5 Codex

Debug Log References

  • Story generated from epic source and architecture/UX planning artifacts.

Completion Notes List

  • Story context created and marked ready-for-dev.

File List

  • _bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/1-7-legacy-schema-compatibility-validation-gate.md
Imported from [_bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/1-7-legacy-schema-compatibility-validation-gate.md](https://onefortheroadgit.sytes.net/dcovington/Campaign_Tracker/src/branch/main/_bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/1-7-legacy-schema-compatibility-validation-gate.md). # Story 1.7: Legacy Schema Compatibility Validation Gate Status: ready-for-dev ## Story As a an administrator, I want to run a compatibility check that confirms legacy table schemas are unchanged against the approved baseline, so that every release can be gated on legacy integrity before deployment. ## Acceptance Criteria 1. **Given** the compatibility check is triggered **When** it runs against the live database **Then** it compares all legacy table structures (column names, types, constraints) against the approved schema baseline stored at initialization 2. **Given** a structural change is detected on any legacy table **When** the check completes **Then** it returns a failure status with a detailed report identifying the affected table, column, and change type (NFR12) 3. **Given** no schema drift is detected **When** the check completes **Then** it returns a pass confirmation with timestamp, number of tables verified, and zero drift count 4. **Given** the check is integrated into the release pipeline **When** it fails **Then** the release is blocked automatically and a failure report is surfaced to the administrator 5. **Given** an administrator is logged in **When** they navigate to the compatibility check feature **Then** they can trigger the check manually and view the most recent check history with timestamps ## Tasks / Subtasks - [ ] Implement story behavior in aligned backend/frontend modules (AC: #1) - [ ] Add or update API/service/UI components required by the story scope - [ ] Keep legacy Access entities read-only and route writes to extension-layer structures - [ ] Cover acceptance criteria #2 in implementation and tests (AC: #2) - [ ] Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed - [ ] Cover acceptance criteria #3 in implementation and tests (AC: #3) - [ ] Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed - [ ] Cover acceptance criteria #4 in implementation and tests (AC: #4) - [ ] Add validation/error handling and UX state updates as needed - [ ] Validate and document completion evidence - [ ] Verify build/tests for touched modules - [ ] Capture changed files and any migration/config implications ## Dev Notes - Follow Epic 1 architecture constraints: ASP.NET Core + React separation, RBAC-aware patterns, and immutable legacy tables. - Reuse shared component and workflow patterns defined in UX and architecture docs; avoid parallel custom implementations. - Keep changes scoped to this story; do not pull forward Epic 2+ features. ### Project Structure Notes - Backend: `BriansClientRouteReports.Server/` - Frontend: `brians-client-route-reports-client/` - Story artifacts: `_bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/` ### References - Story source: `_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/epics.md` (Epic 1 / Story 1.7) - Architecture constraints: `_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md` - UX patterns: `_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/ux-design-specification.md` ## Dev Agent Record ### Agent Model Used GPT-5 Codex ### Debug Log References - Story generated from epic source and architecture/UX planning artifacts. ### Completion Notes List - Story context created and marked ready-for-dev. ### File List - `_bmad-output/implementation-artifacts/1-7-legacy-schema-compatibility-validation-gate.md`
nano added the
Sprint 1
label 3 天之前
nano 新增至Sprint 1 里程碑 3 天之前
登入 才能加入這對話。
未選擇標籤
未選擇里程碑
No Assignees
1 參與者
截止日期

未設定截止日期。

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
取消
儲存
尚未有任何內容

Powered by TurnKey Linux.